Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (10389)	7/27/2006 11:42:55 AM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Duh! Don't you folks say that they would use WMDs regardless of the consequences because they are fanatics? So why talk about what advantages would accrue to Hezbollah or Syria or Iran or whoever else? If they had WMDs, they would at least threaten to use it. I would say that if the Shia and the Sunni both had WMDs (and Israel already has them), ME would be a much more stable place even though the low-intensity conflicts would continue.