Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockalot who wrote (22664)	7/28/2006 3:48:02 PM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Cheatstockalot, I thought you weren't supposed to spend all your time attacking other posters. queen said (on another forum) "Then there was another person in the business here in another department that had an account on another computer, so I suspected that was the hangup and wrote again with the explanation." Stockalot said: So we are to assume on this family farm we have a huge office building... I didn't say that, you are exaggerating and putting words in my post that weren't there. (How can such a poster be trusted?) But we do have two offices with a person on computer in both, with separate duties and separate computers. Apparently on SI users at the same place of business cannot have separate accounts. So be it. Stockalot, deriding queen: "another" person in "another department" joined about the same time Queen did from the same ISP and posted as Butter. No, he didn't post as Butter and you know it. You seem to still be stubbornly and inaccurately insisting that Queen is the old Butter person. Never happened. I never was Butter. The other person posted on Yahoo as peanut_butter until he was imped, and he never was "Butter" either. And yes, of course the two came over here about the same time when Yahoo messed up and YOU suggested everyone come over here. BTW, I never was shrew or dija or bob_rules or mary from schenectady or a dozen others I don't remember now, that you and others accused me of being. And now with your last paragraph you seem to be implying once again that I am Brinker Jr. or Sr. as you have done before. If so, you're still wrong.

To: stockalot who wrote (22664)	7/28/2006 4:34:52 PM
From: Math Junkie	Respond to of 42834

"I can see why SI didn't buy that one." Just my opinion, but I happen to think that people's personal circumstances should not be SI's concern. About a year or so ago, Queen wrote about difficulties she had with her computer's compatibility with Yahoo's message board, and from those conversations it appeared to me that she was not an expert computer user. That to me says that it's no mystery that she thought of a possible cause for her registration difficulties that Dave found implausible. Furthermore, I really don't think they need to worry about her hacking their system. I have described your conspiracy theories about her as self-consistent, but it occurs to me that there is one glaring exception. In the process of trying to establish posting privileges on ONE ACCOUNT, she has openly acknowledged four tries, AND ALL FOUR OF THEM have been variations on the "Queen" theme. This is not the behavior of someone who is trying to put something over on SI. Your theory that she also was Peanut Butter doesn't fit that pattern AT ALL.