SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (297168)7/28/2006 5:39:32 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573827
 
CJ, The fact of the matter is you cannot make any conclusion about the 21% who didn't answer the question.

Message 22666288

There are likely a lot of people who wouldn't want to admit they voted for Bush.




To: combjelly who wrote (297168)7/28/2006 7:23:34 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573827
 
Your attempt to cook the numbers might give some insight, but what is your excuse?

He didn't know that that's what called "cooking the numbers"? Its what he does to numbers all the time? He thought it was normal?



To: combjelly who wrote (297168)7/29/2006 3:08:42 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573827
 
You can imagine whatever you want. It is a fact that 69% of the respondents stated they voted for loser Kerry. This is merely further proof of liberal media bias.

It is likely that the entire portion that declined to respond were too embarrassed they voted for Kerry or the Green party candidate. That would really sku the results.

You can spin the facts in any way that you need to if it makes you feel better.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News