Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockalot who wrote (22713)	7/29/2006 12:35:31 AM
From: yaetmo	Respond to of 42834

Will, I think the term Bob'l Head fits.

To: stockalot who wrote (22713)	7/29/2006 7:24:37 PM
From: dijaexyahoo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

stockalot said: "LOL now that's funny. For a week the Brinker mafia has been bragging on his only top rating in Hulbert that was the result of pretending that Brinker did NOT RECOMMEND any of his UNDERPERFORMING MUTUAL FUNDS but recommended the broad index. He well UNDERPERFORMS the index when he is judged on his mutual fund picks." --Why do you keep telling this LIE that you KNOW is a lie? I've already corrected you 3 or 4 times. You never dispute what I say, but instead just ignore it and go on and on posting your LIES. Don't you have the July Marketimer? It says right on page 3 that both Portfolios I and II have beaten the Active/Passive portfolio over 3 and 5 years!!! They have both beaten it by a SUBSTANTIAL amount over 5 years! If you have any sense of fair play whatsoever (which you don't), you will either show me where I am wrong, or quit telling this LIE. BTW, you asked queen why she wanted to subscribe to the Marketimer. She has already told us why--so she would know when YOU and the other bashers are LYING about what is in it.

To: stockalot who wrote (22713)	7/30/2006 2:18:01 PM
From: shres	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Hey cheatstocksalot, you falsely state... "For a week the Brinker mafia has been bragging on his only top rating in Hulbert that was the result of pretending that Brinker did NOT RECOMMEND any of his UNDERPERFORMING MUTUAL FUNDS but recommended the broad index. He well UNDERPERFORMS the index when he is judged on his mutual fund picks." Dija has called you on your disengenous mistatement of facts more than once but of course you have ignored the truth. "Also, the ratings were based on timing only, so Hulbert used an index instead of the model portfolios. In this particular rating, he was not rating model portfolios, but only timing moves. Stockalot takes offense to this, claiming that the indexes beat brinker's model portfolios over the past 5 years. But according to brinker's newsletter this is not true. Brinker's #1 and #2 portfolios both trounced the indexes by a wide margin. IOW, Hulbert used the indexes and ranked BB #1 in timing, but if he had used brinker's model portfolios he (brinker) would have done MUCH better. So stockalot is just blowing smoke. He's actually lying, because I have corrected him 3 or 4 times,and he has simply ignored me and posted the same b.s. over and over."