Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockalot who wrote (22747)	7/29/2006 9:51:10 PM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Telling me it's obvious is NOT proof, no matter how many times you repeat it. "Notice sHE didn't dispute it for a minute, after the initial silliness about someone else being peanut_butter in 'another department' of her 'business'." Notice that she hasn't retracted that statement either. How many times does she need to say it? Are you claiming that it's impossible that there could be two people at her location who have similar views on Brinker? "Do you still not believe Queen was posting as peanut_butter here just as I said and you argued the point?" If she says she was posting as Peanut Butter, then I will believe it. She is the only person who knows.

To: stockalot who wrote (22747)	7/29/2006 9:55:16 PM
From: dijaexyahoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

stockalot said: <<It is not just "my idea" that Queen was posting as Peanut_butter on SI and as barbobbot among many others on Yahoo. It was obvious and still is.>> --Wasn't it also "obvious" that queen was posting as shres? I've asked you that before, and you never answer. I wonder why? -:) << Notice sHE didn't dispute it for a minute...>> --Yes she did. And only a moron would think she was not a female. Talk about "obvious." If anything is "obvious," it's obvious that queen is a female.

To: stockalot who wrote (22747)	7/29/2006 11:41:55 PM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

stockalot said: Now wait just a minute Math. It is not just "my idea" that Queen was posting as Peanut_butter on SI and as barbobbot among many others on Yahoo. It was obvious and still is. Notice sHE didn't dispute it for a minute, after the initial silliness about someone else being peanut_butter in "another department" of her "business". She kept trying to change the subject to "another" Butter. :) Riiiiight. Cheatalot says "it's obvious", therefore he must be right. No one should question that kind of logic. The great philosophjer DesStockalot: "I think, therefore I KNOW." Even though queen was not here all day, stalkalot just can't seem to leave me out of his thoughts or out of his posts. Stalkalot, what do you mean, I "didn't dispute it". See 22707. And what do you mean "she kept trying to change the subject to "another" Butter" I didn't change any subject. YOU said "Butter", not peanut_butter. See 22702 where you said Math on another site you hammered me claiming you never took exception to my take that Queen was also posting as "Butter" here. ... Well Queen ADMITTED the CONNECTION TO Butter... Ooops, your mistake, I guess. No, I did NOT "admit" any connection to Butter, because there is none, and never was. If "Butter" isn't what you meant, that's your fault, not mine. How many times, how many ways do I have to say it will get through to you? Your are lying. I DID dispute it. If you don't want to believe it, that's YOUR problem, but don't say I didn't dispute it. Keep this, like you keep all posts on file for the last decade or so: I did not post as Butter, ever I did not post as peanut_butter, ever I personally never had more than one active account here at any time. I am not and never was Mark or Butter or Brinker or Brinker Jr. or anyone else as you have accused me approximately a thousand times. (not here) Why do you seemingly so enjoy using the dumb made-up word "sHE". Not that it matters a lot, but I submit that's your fantasy asserting itself again that I am a man, not a woman. YOUR problem. How many times have you said I wasn't a farmer and how many ways do I need to say that I am, not that it's a freaking bit of YOUR business. And how silly is it for you to ridicule and deny it, since you wouldn't know the slightest thing about me except what you make up in your continuous fantasy stalking. How many times have you accused me of being a drunk and a gambler purely for the sake of harassment, even though you know NOTHING about me except what you make up in your fantasies (not here, of course, hopefully you couldn't get away with it here.) What do you get out of stalking me? Am I that threatening to you? That's just downright humorous. I didn't get to listen to Brinker today because I had company all day. Sounds like it was interesting.