Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pigstuff who wrote (22767)	7/30/2006 11:10:46 AM
From: stockalot	Respond to of 42834

Mister Pig, I am afraid Mr. Brinker will be unlikely to oink to you today. It is likely he is dressing down some shills who were caught and worrying about claims he's made on performance numbers that might get him in trouble like that poor old schlub the SEC got a hold of last week. I'm guessing that guy wasn't hiding a third of his portfolio that is down 50% after 6 yrs and bragging on the rest. And Brinker be consistant on financial or political matters? Puleeze, what are you nutz? Same guy who said during the first QQQ trade when he got out at the low of the summer at 84 as the Qs had been over 100 days before and went over 100 days after: "The most important thing in a bear market is capital preservation" Two months later he was sending a bulletin to throw up to 1/3 of a portfolio at the QQQs in the 80s and has held on every day (though DISHONESTLY HIDING) for nearly 6 yrs now. Alas he's best described as "expedient". Looks like shres is trying to help out the multialias poster who was caught by taking up the acronymn that tied the two persons together. Only time that thing was used in the history of SI--and by both peanut butter and queen within the first and only week they were posting here. Math is over on Yahoo trying to make the multialias multiple stories look plausible. That is fun to watch. They do have to be much more careful here than on Yahoo where they got by with murder. Oops I'm not accusing Brinker of espousing that, but I wouldn't sleep in a seat in front of any of these m. a. shills on an airplane.

To: pigstuff who wrote (22767)	7/30/2006 11:14:58 AM
From: pigstuff	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42834

Bob, I sure hope that you were not the 2nd person that put me on ignore. I'm a little surprised. By now I expected at least 6 or 7. Anyway, I've been thinking about this "oink-oink" stuff, and that doesn't sound too dignified. People might think that you are actually unrated or at the bottom of the barrel. Even dilbert won't be able to help you then. How about saying " the doomsayers were squealing like stuck pigs." BTW, I think you should tell FakeDija that he should at least read the threads he is criticizing, or not admit to just taking wild guesses about what is written. That's not too professional or objective. What's your take on this peanut_butter, multiple alias stuff? Do you know how many dial-up computers sHe has? Do you think there is a "hot" key set up to insert "AAR"? I'm surprised that your super-shill Math_junkie hasn't thought of that one yet. <ROAR> I mean, these 17 paragraph denials using every concoction of "butter" and "peanut" except the true BUSTED id is pretty demeaning and hilarious. Bob, with all due respect, I think you need to place a help-wanted ad. You need some new shills that can think and help you. This bunch has just been blown out of town with laughter and ridicule. They even lie outright to their own friends. I think you deserve better. Edited to reply to Mr Stockalot: I just read your note, and I couldn't agree more about inconsistency. I was posting at the same time that you were. That is more proof that genius minds think alike! ;---)