Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockalot who wrote (22789)	7/30/2006 8:55:44 PM
From: queenleah	Respond to of 42834

stalkalot, that whole post is lies. It was a lead pipe cinch that Queen was the Queen of multiple alias posting at Yahoo. Often with only her typing late at night there would often tons of recc given to a nonsensical post. She was caught two or three times posting under a different screen name while piling up the recs. ALL of that, every bit of it is ONLY in your imaginative opinion. Proof? Nonexistent. Yes, I know you keep posts that you choose to believe and CLAIM prove something. We've seen them ad nauseum. SI indeed found that Queen was violating their multiple alias posting provisions and took action. If you will look, you will see that the Queen90700 and peanut_butter aliases were banished at the same time. Yes, which proves WHAT aside from what I honestly confirmed? That does NOT mean they were the same person, and they were not. Everything you think you know about the situation, you learned from me, honestly saying what happened, aside from what you made up and inserted into my posts all by yourself. She has claimed that sHE only posts from one computer and the other one doesn't work. No, I did NOT say there another one that "doesn't work". Try getting it straight. And I am NOT a "sHE", whatever "sHE" is supposed to mean, it's just another lie. Queen said she had no connection with this other person. No, I did NOT say I had no connection with the other person. I said I was NOT both persons, NOT both accounts. A family member of queen who collaborates with her... Wrong. I did not say anything about collaborating or working together on SI in any way. Queen never has said that she knew this peanut_butter was posting from "another department in the business". She seemed to indicate it was a shocking discovery. I never said I knew or didn't know. "Seemed" to indicate? Only in your distortions. I never said anything of the kind. If I make a statement you don't like, you say I lie. If I ignore or decline to respond to a statement of yours, you say I "don't deny it". Where did you go to law school? So why hasn't Queen claimed it was a spouse or a crazy aunt in the attic who snuck down to the office complex and started posting on SI Brinker thread the same day she did causing Queen to get caught and both of them banished, if you now claim it was a family member, Math? That's been addressed, but of course you ignore what you want to ignore and lie and misquote that which you wish to lie about and distort and misquote. Many people came here about the same time at your suggestion, when Yahoo messed up their boards. No mystery. And OF COURSE the two accounts were banished at the same time, because administration believed they were the same person. No mystery. PB didn't post much after being imped at yahoo by the loserimp and he thought possibly things would be better in that regard over here. But he doesn't waste much time on nonsense, he'd rather be out doing something more productive than responding to harassers. Why doesn't anyone with some authority take a look at your constant harassment and shinola such as your "crazy aunt" paragraph above and multiple others? And yes, I'd like to ignore you, but since you insist on continuing the lying and misquoting and harassing, I will continue to respond, as long as I'm allowed. When you stop with the harassment, I will stop with the response, if I'm allowed. One person, one screen name at a time is the policy here at SI. It seems that you and Queen and many others are in a snit because that is the way it is. No snit, except for cheatalot as evidenced by the lengths to which he will go to lie, misquote and harass. I think it is absolutely the right thing to do. I do too, not that you would know anything about doing the right thing.