New reasons to soak up the sun
With air conditioning running around the clock and electric bills doubling, there's fresh incentive for homeowners to consider solar energy.
By T.J. Sullivan, Special to The Times
July 30, 2006
FOLKER KORTE racked up $21,000 worth of energy-saving upgrades to his single-story, three-bedroom home in San Pedro last year but only spent $9,000.
Plus, he didn't have to fork over the full amount for the several rooftop solar panels and then wait for a rebate. Korte paid for his portion, and his contractor obtained the balance from the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power through its Solar Incentive Program.
That's only the beginning. Korte was also eligible for up to $2,000 in federal tax credits. His electricity bill has dropped from a monthly average of $90 to $30. And, as the price of oil soars, the solar panels increase the appeal and value of his home.
The costs of eco-renovations such as solar energy systems, insulation and energy-efficient appliances are more than offset by the resulting increase in market value to the home, experts and studies say. Some realty agents even use energy-saving attributes in their marketing pitches, listing a home's solar distinction alongside the swimming pool and spa.
For every $1 saved in annual utility costs, analysts have suggested that a $20 increase in home value results. Following this formula, Korte's utility bill savings of $60 a month or $720 a year would result in an increase in the value of his home by more than $14,000. Not bad for a $9,000 out-of-pocket expense.
A consumer survey conducted in May by Sharp Electronics Corp. found that 64% of the 1,004 polled said they'd be willing to pay more for a home with a solar-power system.
Alan Black, a solar financial analyst in San Jose and a member of the board of the American Solar Energy Society, says homeowners often find that the savings on the electric bill offset the loan payments sometimes necessary to finance a home improvement like solar, which can cost $16,000 to $20,000, or more, before rebates.
In years past, some homeowners have steered clear of energy-saving improvements because they didn't intend to stay in the home long enough to recoup the investment through utility-bill savings. However, that mind-set may change if a slowing housing market and rising oil prices reveal that homes with energy-saving features sell faster and at higher prices.
Much the same way that greater numbers of drivers have begun to seek fuel-saving hybrid vehicles, real estate agents say they are seeing more buyers concerned with energy efficiency.
"Twenty years from now, if it's not solar, it's going to be a fixer," said Donna Benton, a real estate agent with Re/Max Westside Properties in Santa Monica. "I just sold one in Encino and we made it part of the marketing: 'Solar pool and solar spa.' "
Lori McGuire, an agent with Re/Max Real Estate Services in Dana Point, also emphasized energy savings when advertising a solar home she sold 18 months ago. "The first line was 'Save costs with solar energy,' " said McGuire, who's been an agent for 21 years. There's even a category in the Multiple Listing Service where you can search for homes with solar energy, she added.
Ellen Mackey, who lives in a 1950s ranch house in Sun Valley, was thinking solar when she went shopping for a home, insisting on one with good southern rooftop exposure to the sun; about 200 square feet of unshaded rooftop is necessary.
After purchasing the home, her first step toward reducing her energy costs was to take out all the incandescent light bulbs, replacing them with fluorescent. Mackey installed Solatubes, which deliver sunlight to ceiling-mounted skylights, cutting down on the need for electric light during the daytime. And she tinted her windows to help keep out the heat. Then in 1998, the Department of Water and Power approached her about installing solar panels on her rooftop as part of a demonstration project.
Together, the improvements have helped Mackey cut energy consumption so much that she uses only as much power as the solar panels produce. The panels further keep the house cool by insulating a large portion of the rooftop from the sun.
The downside for Mackey is that she doesn't own the panels, so the L.A. department owns the energy they produce. As a result, Mackey still has to pay an average monthly electricity bill of $40. But, when the demonstration period ends, Mackey plans to purchase the panels from the department, and then, she says, her monthly electricity bill will disappear. If the system ends up generating more power than Mackey uses, Water and Power would send her money, instead of an invoice.
Mackey emphasizes that point when solar-curious visitors wander through the 1,795-square-foot house each October as part the Eco-Home Network's solar home tour. "When they see the bills," Mackey said, "they get pretty excited."
Rebates and utility savings aside, the upfront costs of making improvements can still be daunting. An incentive may cut the cost of a solar energy system in half, but that half can still amount to more than $10,000.
Many lenders recognize that, and have created programs to encourage homeowners to borrow the money.
Manufacturer BP Solar suggests consumers consult solar dealers about financing options. BP also provides a "solar savings estimator" on its website at bpsolar.us to help consumers calculate potential savings on their electric bills.
Among the lender programs intended to encourage energy-saving home improvements is Fannie Mae's 10-year energy loan. Other financing options are explained at the California Energy Commission's Consumer Energy Center (www.consumerenergycenter.org. |
