Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (3882)	8/1/2006 4:10:40 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224704

You idiot, 9-11 happened on Bush's watch. What kind of a stupid liar are you anyway? You can't actually believe Clinton had any influence over whether or not 9-11 was carried out. He was gone for almost a year by then. Bush was the one who disbanded all Clinton's top-quality counter terrorism units, including Richard Clarke's Al Qaida desk inside the White House. Bush was the one who ignored the specific warning on 8-6-01 that OBL was determined to attack inside the US probably using hijackings. And it was Clinton who was heads-up and stopped the 1999 LAX bombing. So what did Bush do when warned on 8-6-01 in Crawsford Texas? Nothing. He did absolutely nothing. Not a single phonecall was made to the FAA, FBI or anyone. Rice didn't do anythying either and she was supposed to be his "security advisor". Also, why did Bush call the FBI off Saudi nationals inside the US? Why didn't he push the USS Cole investigations? Why did he let all the Saudis ou8t of the country on 9-13-01 without interrogation? And why did he let Osama Bin Laden escape at Tora Bora when even Geraldo knew we had him cornered? You don't get it, lady. Bush is terrible on counter-terrorism. And while Clinton wasn't perfect, at least he was on the ball.