Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (22887)	8/1/2006 8:39:37 PM
From: pigstuff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Ms Honey brilliantly observed: >>Ms. queen, I am disappointed and very surprised that you would take my quote and butcher it up just to suit your own purposes--not nice at all, dear. Mmmmmmmm. Who is that other poster that likes to take a quote, or a post and change the words to suit his purpose? Stumper! Do you think old shres works at the same ADM conglomerate on the 84th floor? Or was it called the AAR building? >>As I said--not nice dear, I'm shocked! I'm also stunned that Mr FakeDija appears to lack the desire to debate substantial issues concerning market timing or the inability to time the market. I can understand his reluctance in defending the indefensible, but I thought that he would at least try.

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (22887)	8/1/2006 10:53:02 PM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Honeytres said Ms. queen, I am disappointed and very surprised that you would take my quote and butcher it up just to suit your own purposes--not nice at all, dear. I said this: "I am pleased to tell you that indeed a month by month history of Bob Brinker's enthusiastic touting of QQQQ's beginning in October 2000 with the "Act Immediately" bulletin and continuing until the very last guidance that he gave his subscribers in March 2003, when he did the big switcheroo-coverup and moved on (leaving the trade unclosed and hopefully forgotten) is being systematically posted at Honey's Brinker Beehive Buzz at Suite 101. "We" :) are now up to March 2001..." My point was brevity and I removed nothing of substance from your phony Brinkerhater blog question and answer scenario, as anyone can see from the above "complete" version. And you've neglected the central point of my post of which you complain. My point was that your little disingenuous scripted set-up scheme is quite "transparent" as you like to say (not that there's anything wrong with that.) Are you actually denying that this "question" from someone with whom you have a long internet history and a seemingly close longterm internet friendship (I imply nothing inappropriate) is a sincere question and not a disingenuous set-up for you to use this site to promote your Brinkerhater blog on another site? (not that there's anything wrong with that except the deceit involved) Do you deny that the poster knows perfectly well what appears on your Brinkerhater blog from day to day and hour to hour and has from Day One, and has participated in that blog from Day One? Do you deny that you frequently have called this same poster your "Director of Public Relations" for that same blog on other sites? Not that there's anything wrong with promoting your Brinkerhater blog, but the attempted deceit and manipulation speaks for its honesty all by itself.