Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (22898)	8/2/2006 12:36:48 AM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Honeytres, (1) would be your correct answer there, based on voluminous evidence in posts by those who HAVE been there, and what my own eyes have seen of your own constant posting and re-posting and cross-posting of years of what can only realistically be called Brinkerhate (or Brinkerbashing if you prefer). And why do YOU never answer a question (except for those which are so transparently set up for you to promote your own Brinkerbasher site, of course!)

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (22898)	8/2/2006 12:46:00 AM
From: yaetmo	Respond to of 42834

Della, It might be that that other person, who works in that other dept, on this simple family farm, is the one that goes to the beehive, and then he reports what he sees back to TheQueen.

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (22898)	8/2/2006 12:52:02 AM
From: dijaexyahoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

honey said: <<What is one to think? 1) Are we to think that she would actually pass such a vitriolic judgement about a site she has never seen? 2) OR, are we to think that she blatantly lied when she said she had never read it? This is not a rhetorical question. Answers would be most welcome.>> --Thanks for the hanging curve, honey! The answer is (1). However, unlike some other posters here, she bases her 'judgement' on evidence, rather than wishful thinking. Here is the evidence: She knows math and I don't post there. She knows you post there, she knows you copy-and-paste newslettercheat's and stockalot's posts there, she knows pig posts there, she knows kirk posts there. She probably assumes that basher posts there. She also knows, based upon the testimony of math and myself, that a non-basher with the alias bbaddict posted there briefly, and was treated with incredible rudeness by you and kirk, and kirk's sycophants, and essentially stopped posting as a result of the rude treatment. She also knows that your board is part of 101, which includes the "free discussion" board, which is run by kirk. She knows that kirk kicked me off the board, and she knows the content of my posts here and on Yahoo, and she can certainly figure out that there was no legitimate reason for me being kicked off. She also knows that math left that board because he didn't like the way kirk was running it. She also knows fish was kicked off that board. Personally, I think she has more than enough evidence to draw a conclusion without getting herself all dirty by going over there!