Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: atm_prophet who wrote (66827)	8/2/2006 10:36:20 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Does that prove who was responsible? Who did this? Amazing that all those cell phones worked from 30,000 feet too. Mine hardly works in the car at ground level. And cell antennas are designed to send and receive signals horizontally. Attorney General John Ashcroft in his briefing to members of Congress said the hijackers were working in groups of three to five members. This is strange for Ashcroft to say this. If there's 19 hijackers in 4 groups and it's known that they are working in groups of 3 to 5, we can assume that at least one plane had three and another had 5. lets assign 3 hijackers to the first plane, 5 to the next. That's 8 hijackers. 19 take away 8 leaves 11 for the next two planes. If one of the planes had three, the other had 8. Not in the range. If one of the planes had four the other had 7. Again not in the range. If one of the planes had five the other had 6. Not in the range. So it's impossible for two of the planes to have had three and five hijackers without the rest of the story being wrong. Do you have any proof of who did it. I think we all know what happened.