Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric L who wrote (54124)	8/3/2006 10:23:01 AM
From: hedgefund	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197246

"Fortunately most of your profane utterances in the Hall of Shame you built for yourself there have been expunged, even though many of your inanities have not." EricL: The above seems quite a bit over the top... HF

To: Eric L who wrote (54124)	8/3/2006 3:21:35 PM
From: Q8tfreebe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197246

"if there really is such a thing. It takes about the same number as CDMA2000 takes in 850 MHz." Actually, if you read the press report coming out of Australia, it appears as though coverage performance of Telstra's 850W-CDMA network is a fraction of the coverage performance of Telstra's 850MHz CDMA network. Therefore, it would appear that Telstra (or Ericsson) will need to spend a lot more money on 850W-CDMA base stations to match the coverage of Telstra's 850CDMA network. Doesn't sound like a real smart thing to do from where I'm sitting.