Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shres who wrote (22996)	8/3/2006 3:01:34 PM
From: Kirk ©	Respond to of 42834

CACS now over $8. Do you think Brinker wishes he was not so unlucky to have recommended QQQQ back in 2000 at $83? I was REALLY lucky to have added many thousands of shares of CACS to my ROTH in December 2002 under 40 cents when everyone was dumping for a tax loss. Really lucky others were foolishly selling. Big time investors, with billions to manage, can't take advantage of these thinly traded, not well followed but high quality stocks. Warren Buffett said he could do 50% a year if he only had millions rather than billions to manage. As for Harry Markowitz: "Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it. “ -- Chinese proverb

To: shres who wrote (22996)	8/3/2006 3:04:24 PM
From: stockalot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Shres seems to be trying to start a different board to discuss Kirk. While intially just whining about the Brinker critics, now it seems Shres has exclusively zeroed in on Kirk to the point of harassment. If he wants to change the subject to Kirk, why doesn't he join SI and start a thread about Kirk. Or perhaps Math will be willing to do so for Shres as he mentioned and they can take this conversation over there. One of the Terms of Use concerns OFF TOPIC posts. Shres has taken this way beyond the occasional variance from the subject of the thread and now is obviously locked in on an attempt to hijack the thread to address another subject entirely. I would ask that you take your Kirk talk to another venue. Member 9114108