SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: YanivBA who wrote (67457)8/4/2006 9:42:13 AM
From: regli  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
I am traveling so I can't post them all at this point. Here is the first one.

Loan-only CDS poised for take-off

By Richard Beales

Published: July 24 2006 18:25 | Last updated: July 24 2006 18:25

Bankers love the kudos and rewards of creating an entirely new financial instrument. Most innovations, however, are more evolutionary than revolutionary – although they can still be immensely profitable.

That is the hope for loan credit default swaps, or LCDS. These credit derivatives allow market participants to buy and sell a type of insurance against a borrower defaulting on its debt.

The market for credit default swaps based on unsecured debt - generally speaking, bonds - of companies and countries has sky-rocketed in recent years to reach more than Dollars 17,000bn globally by the end of 2005, a figure that measures the total exposure underlying outstanding derivatives contracts.

LCDS contracts, by contrast, are designed to track the credit of secured loans - specifically the leveraged, or junk-rated, loans used mainly in private equity-led buyouts. When a company defaults, its secured debtholders typically recover more of their money than unsecured lenders do, making secured loans less risky. But lenders may still need to hedge their exposure, while hedge funds and other traders are increasingly making speculative credit bets in-volving all parts of a company's capital structure.

The potential for LCDS is clear. Lisa Watkinson, head of structured credit business development at Lehman Brothers, says that in the unsecured CDS market, the total exposure underlying derivatives contracts has mushroomed to become worth a multiple of the value of the actual unsecured debt trading in the cash, or physical, market.

The nascent Dollars 5bn-Dollars 10bn LCDS market, meanwhile, remains only a tiny fraction of the volume of all leveraged loans outstanding. If the LCDS market ends up following the same path as unsecured CDS, it could grow to be worth many trillions of dollars.

Several factors point to an acceleration of LCDS trading on both sides of the Atlantic.

To begin with, there is huge interest in gaining exposure to the leveraged loan market through derivatives. Dramatic growth in the issuance of the loans in the US and more recently in Europe has been fuelled both by hedge fund activity and demand from investment vehicles known as collateralised loan obligations, or CLOs. A CLO holds a portfolio of loans and repackages them as securities with different levels of risk for sale to a variety of investors. Demand for CLOs - which offer extra yield compared with other similarly-rated fixed income investments - has spawned a plethora of vehicles, which in turn compete to buy leveraged loans.

CLO managers are itching to get the same credit exposure in derivative or synthetic form, which they can achieve by selling protection in the LCDS market.

Meanwhile, non-bank in-vestors are increasingly active in the leveraged loan market - once dominated by big lending banks - making the use of complex derivative strategies much more likely. Bankers say that as much as 80 per cent of US leveraged loans are provided by hedge funds and other non-banks. In Europe, banks still make up more than half the market, but their share is falling rapidly.

Two other developments could help the LCDS market take off. First, the US and European markets now trade on largely standardised, although currently somewhat different, documentation templates - reflecting in part the different composition of the two markets.

"Standardisation of the documents is the key," says Tom Price, director of Markit, the data and valuation group. Reaching this landmark has proved crucial to the liquidity and growth of other CDS markets.

In addition, in both the US and Europe, bankers are developing LCDS indices tracking the combined credit of dozens of companies. In the unsecured CDS market, indices have become by far the most heavily traded instruments, both as ways to take broad bets on credit and as ingredients in complex strategies.

For LCDS, the iTraxx LevX index in Europe and the LCDX in the US could both go live this autumn.

Yet despite its potential, one problem for the LCDS market so far has been a shortage of buyers of protection, such as lenders hedging loan exposure or investors taking a negative view of credit. "(At a recent conference) the joke was there were 400 in attendance, but 398 were protection sellers and only two buyers," says Mr Price. But he adds that the situation is now improving. "Things have started to even out more."

One reason is that new capital rules for banks may also encourage the most obvious buyers of LCDS protection - big lending banks - to use the instruments to manage their exposures, says Richard Stuart-Reckling, product manager for European credit derivatives at Morgan Stanley.

The Basel II rules, which are due to take effect next year, are designed to match better the capital that banks are required to hold with the risks that they take, and Mr Stuart-Reckling says banks' returns on capital could suffer in some cases unless they hedge more of their loans.

In addition, betting against the credit performance of leveraged loans no longer seems the non-starter it did for a time.

Default rates declined in recent years and remain at historical lows, but are now widely expected to start ticking higher. That means LCDS protection, typically bought under a five-year contract, could become more valuable.

Hedge funds and other market players are becoming more and more sophisticated and increasingly invest across the spectrum of a company's capital, from equity through to senior debt. And LCDS offers them something they did not have before.

"Now investors finally have a way to short leveraged loans," says Jeremy Vogelmann, LCDS trader at Lehman. "They look at it as a relative value play."

If those investors ultimately find the LCDS market useful, the sky could be the limit.



To: YanivBA who wrote (67457)8/4/2006 9:44:32 AM
From: regli  Respond to of 110194
 
The innovation combat zone

By Gillian Tett

Published: July 19 2006 03:00 | Last updated: July 19 2006 03:00

When the Bank for International Settlements, the central banking group, did its last triennial survey of the global derivatives and foreign exchange world in 2004, the results shocked some.

The Basel-based group put daily global derivatives turnover at almost $6,000bn - half the size of the US economy.

Now the BIS could startle again.

Yesterday, it announced another survey of the derivatives market that it hopes to complete "before the end of 2007" and which will cover the credit derivatives world for the first time.

The results will almost certainly show that the derivatives world is contin-uing to explode in sizeand becoming a lot more complex.

The capital markets world is in the grip of an innovation wave that is leading to the creation of numerous new products, many of which barely existed when the BIS did its last review.

Terms such as LCDS (loan credit default swaps), CDOs (collateralised debt obligations), variance swaps and binary options have entered the banking lexicon, though few outside the industry understand exactly what they are.

As one senior banker recently admitted, "Almost every other week a new word pops up that I haveto ask (my juniors) to explain."

Bankers say the innovations are helping investors and bolstering the resilience of markets by allowing them to tailor their risks and assets to their needs in ever more sophisticated ways.

Cynics contend that some of the new products could be introducing more risk into the system, while bolstering bankers' fees.

The pace of innovation is creating challenges for investors, companies and regulators as they try to keep up with the changes, particularly since much of the innovation is occurring away from exchanges and tends to be opaque.

"We have seen dramatic changes in the US andglobal financial system over the past 25 years," said Timothy Geithner, president of the New York Federal Reserve, in a speech earlier this year.

"We are now in themidst of another wave of innovation."

What is driving this surge of creativity?

Some say historically low global interest rates have forced financiers to develop more complex instruments, such as CDOs, in an effortto boost investment returns.

Another contributing factor cited by Mr Geithner and others is the increasingsignificance of hedge funds, which tend to be nimble, innovative and eager to make specialised investments.

Financiers have become more creative than ever in designing products tailored to specific tax, accounting and regulatory regimes.

One factor in the recent dramatic growth in credit derivatives has been a desire by banks to shift risk off their balance sheets to comply with international regulatory standards.

Similarly, an issue that is helping to drive some of the equity derivatives innovation is the growing pressure on pension funds to better match their assets with their liabilities.

Meanwhile, tax remainsa perennial trigger forcreativity.

At a conference in London on LCDS last week, Robert Lepone of Morgan Stanley pointed out that one attraction of this new product - which bankers are aggressively marketing to their clients - is that "in certain jurisdictions with withholding tax issues, this (LCDS product) does not attract withholding tax".

Separately, some eight centuries after European merchants first produced creative schemes to circumvent a Christian ban on usury, the Islamic financial world has become a new source of innovation.

This week Sabic became the first company in Saudi Arabia to issue a large sukuk, or Islamic bond.

Technology is also driving innovation.

Electronic finance not only integrates markets around the world, but makes it easier to construct innovative financial schemes.

"These days, most financial products are virt-ual products. They existin cyberspace," says Stephen Kingsley, managing dir-ector of BearingPoint, the consultancy.

"That means that although there is a capital constraint, there is no physical constraint to what you can create."

It is enabling bankers to create tailor-made products for their clients at relatively low additional cost.

"What we are seeing is the increasing customisation of products, taking the structuring onus off the end user but putting risk into the market place," adds Mr Kingsley.

But the growing integration of global markets via electronic tradingmeans the competitive pressures on banks are intensifying.

Unlike in other industries, such as engineering, the concept of "patents" has never existed in the financial world.

As a result, although it typically took 10-15 years for new products to spread across the market place in the 1970s, diffusion of innovation now happens "in less than five years", according to Mercer Oliver Wyman, the consultants.

A consequence is that banks will have to invent new products faster than ever in the coming yearsif they want to beat thecompetition.

However, another implication, says Nick Studer of Mercer Oliver Wyman, is that "the next wave of innovation will happen lessin products and more inthe way that products are delivered".

What will matter, he says, "is not just having a brilliant idea but being able to implement it".

This has already sparked a headline-grabbing battle between dealers, exchanges and other start-up groups over who will dominate the process of trading in the current years.

The innovation battleground in the capital markets world could be about to become even more complex - and creative.



To: YanivBA who wrote (67457)8/4/2006 9:48:00 AM
From: regli  Respond to of 110194
 
Europe's loan market must go public

By Gillian Tett

Published: July 20 2006 17:17 | Last updated: July 20 2006 17:17

Several hundred European investors gathered last week in a London hotel to discuss one of the new(ish) derivatives causing a buzz in the capital markets - leveraged loans credit default swaps.

First, the bankers raved about the joy of LCDS. Then a sharp-witted woman from Bear Stearns posed a killer question: "If you are a UK-regulated entity looking to hedge [with LCDS]...how can you do this without trading on inside information?"

How indeed? A couple of weeks ago I wrote about the recent price movements in Eurotunnel debt, and noted that this saga highlighted the murkiness beseting London's fast growing loan markets.

However, I make no apologies for returning to similar terrain, given the amount of debate the issue is now generating behind the scenes in London's financial world - a discussion that could become even more complex with the arrival of LCDS in Europe.

For, as I explained in relation to Eurotunnel, Europe's debt markets are beset by a structural anomaly. Until five years ago, the loan world was not really a traded market, but a clubby cartel, where banks got confidential data about companies in exchange for providing long-term, relationship funds.

However these days, relationship banking is dead, at least in the leveraged (or sub-investment grade) loan world. Credit funds account for between 40 and 65 per-cent of primary leveraged loan syndicates, depending which data you believe. That means these funds can get access to privileged information, even though many funds are also trading loans - and other instruments.

That creates huge potential for what bankers coyly call "assymetric information flows" (or insider dealing, in plain English). And though there are laws in London that apparently ban insider trading, it is still not entirely clearcut how these apply to the self-policed credit and loan markets.

However, now that LCDS is being added into this mix, the problem could potentially get worse. The idea of this new derivative instrument first cropped up in the US about 18 months ago, and what it essentially does is let you bet whether a loan will go bad (just as you can use a CDS to bet on whether a bond will default.)

In many ways, this is a thoroughly-welcome addition to the modern financial toolkit. But the rub is that the players most likely to want to hedge their loans via LCDS will often include those who acqired them via the primary markets. And they could thus be holding confidential information. Hence the assymetric information flows.

Is there any solution to this? One obvious idea might be to look across the Atlantic, where loans have been freely traded by non-banks for a long time and the loan market consequently tends to be viewed in a more public manner.

To be sure, this US market is not nearly as transparent as the bond world, and there is stiil a public-private divide among primary dealers. But the emphasis on public disclosure is greater than in Europe; so much so, that the terms of US loans are routinely published, so they can be seen by junior creditors (an utterly alien idea to London).

Some of these practices are now seeping across the Atantic, as US financiers move to Europe (and their lawyers begin to worry about possible future lawsuits). Most US investment banks now put as much loan activity as possible on the public side - and keep strict "walls" between public and private deals. Similarly, some hedge funds, such as CQS, are routinely staying "public" on loan deals, to ensure they can trade without any taint of suspicion.

But other, more traditional, European institutions are not. Hence, a bizarre practice is now emerging whereby most leveraged loan syndications carry two sets of documentation - a "public" prospectus for investors worried about insider trading laws; and a "private" information pack for everybody else.

This system is time-consuming and clumsy. It also seems dangerously prone to leakage. So perhaps it is time to simplify the mess by placing most leveraged loans firmly in the public arena? Indeed, I cannot see any reason why Europe should not also publish the terms of loans, so that they can be seen by other creditors.

I am told that many London bankers loathe this idea. Many companies would undoubtedly dislike it too. But the days when London's loan market existed as a clubby cartel are over - at least in the leveraged space. It is time for bankers, companies and regulators to wake up and smell the coffee, or at least the potential odour of dodgy dealing. Otherwise some seemingly-sensible innovations - such as LCDS - could become badly tainted further down the road.