To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (746935 ) 8/4/2006 8:06:32 AM From: DuckTapeSunroof Respond to of 769670 Re: "clear enough?" It was always 'clear' enough... it just didn't make any *sense*! To imagine that a secular, Western media would be CLAMORING for religious rule of society... just because they really, really, really disliked a lame duck US President who's days are counting down anyway. Really now, it's just FANTASY (especially when there are *some many OTHER ways* to express a dislike for the guy, if that's what 'they' want to do.) And, I thought that I was pretty clear in my two posts about this, too: Re: "Yes... as long as it can make Bush look bad...." P-L-E-A-S-E! The 'LIBERAL', secular (that means: non-religious), 'Main Stream Media' is a 'friend' of fundamentalist, Theocratic-leaning, religious nut-jobs? The modernity-loving secular Western media are secretly craving a religious fundamentalism that will return them, and their societies, to AUTHORITARIAN RELIGIOUS RULE such as was seen in the 12th. and 13th. centuries --- (& an Islamic Theocracy at that... not even a Christian Theocracy such as existed in Europe at that time in history....) And, ALL BECAUSE they so hate a lame duck American President who only has a little more then 2 years left in office anyway? For this they are willing to toss science and freedoms and liberty and Democracy and human rights ALL OVERBOARD and sign-up for FUNDAMENTALIST ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS RULE?????????? Sorry, doesn't pass the basic sanity test --- (Perhaps on Planet Bizarro, where everything is upside down... but not here in the 21st. Century, on Earth. :-)Message 22686479 And: Re: "You give the msm more credit than they deserve" Not really.... Just pointing out the OBVIOUS: they ain't exactly CLAMORING for a Theocracy to rule us all! Some, somewhere may be --- but the media ain't leading that charge! LOL! (Unless it's a *Christian* Theocracy envisioned... perhaps some small segment of the media [900 Club?] may be... but NOT MANY.)Message 22686654