Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (23067)	8/5/2006 12:58:25 AM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

How does your question about UTEK relate to what I said? In any case, the answer is that it first appeared in the newsletter with an objective of 50% profit, which he expected in 12 to 18 months. I don't know of any previous attempts in the newsletter of trades with a specific anticipated time frame, but my back issues only go back to 1996. I don't think anyone has proven that Brinker was insincere in believing there was going to be a counter-trend rally in QQQQ. In Grubman's case, there is alleged to be documentation of a quid pro quo for an AT&T recommendation. "Grubman also derived a personal benefit from the arrangement, as detailed in a two-page memo to his boss, Citigroup CEO Sandy Weill, titled 'AT&T and the 92nd Street Y': If Weill, a member of AT&T's board and a close associate of AT&T CEO C. Michael Armstrong, would help Grubman's twins get into the 92nd Street Y, Grubman would become more receptive to AT&T's business model. (Weill proposed a donation of $1 million to the school if the Grubman kids were admitted.)" prnewswire.com