Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dijaexyahoo who wrote (23070)	8/5/2006 2:05:48 PM
From: pigstuff	Respond to of 42834

Here's my last try FakeDija, since I'm starting to confuse myself. I find it interesting that people can give Brinker credit for good calls, but not trust him enough to follow those calls. I find that interesting and also unusual. So they brag about the calls in retrospect, but they did not trust him enough to follow the recommendations in real time. That's why I like to ask my dumb question "Is Bob Brinker honest and trustworty?" It seems even shills don't trust him many times. It's not a knock on Brinker, or his promoters (commonly known as shills). It's not even a question. It's an observation and a statement. How's that for clarity? >>Didn't you give Elaine Garzarelli credit for a good call in 1987? Did you follow her call to "Sell Everything" in 1996? Nope! I don't even know who she is, or what she recommended. I was making a comment about the lead-in paragraph for this thread about Brinker. I said Elaine should get equal space to respond. How you concluded the above from that is quite a stretch! >>I don't know why a person would have to follow someone in lock-step, in order to give him or her credit for a good call. I agree. But..... I don't know how someone could brag about Brinker's calls and yet, not follow them? >>You're making NO sense. Yes, that is SOP for me.