SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (10324)8/5/2006 10:56:41 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14758
 
You included articles which incorporated the word traitor (not a good idea, imo) and posts where traitor or traitors was used in quotes, quoting someone else using it, or where it was used as a joke (and the person using the quotes was sometimes using the quotation to show there was something wrong with calling people traitors), and very oddly you have put Prolife in as a liberal. And you used a post (in the liberal category) in which the word traitor was being applied to the Christian Lebanese, and which had nothing to do with what we were talking about on SI. It's silly AND bizarre to use that kind of data. Note- the fact that I think your sampling technique is silly and bizarre is NOT name calling of you. You seem to think it is, but I have no comment to make of you, only on the way you sampled the data.

If you looked at my searches of BOTH traitor and traitors you will see that I read every post, explained my methodology (no articles, no posts where traitor was talking about Benedict Arnold or the Xtian Lebanese, etc.)

I don't know how you can think you did a good job here with your "facts", but it's quite clear you do. I find your survey riddled with flaws, and worthless. (Note- just to reiterate, that means I have a problem with your survey, it is not name calling of you, and is not meant to reflect on anything other than the data set you have presented.)