SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: snookcity who wrote (104892)8/6/2006 10:15:16 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Snook, the numbers from online, though, are overwhelming. PokerStars sent 1200 players and Party Poker 800. Live casinos just can't put on that much action. Of course, I am off because Stars and Party and the others will still send people to the WSOP. They will just be people from foreign countries or expatriates.



To: snookcity who wrote (104892)8/7/2006 5:43:15 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
David Sklansky's new book, "No Limit Hold Em: Theory and Practice," is terrific. I have had a lot of vague ideas and concepts about the difference between playing tournaments and cash games, but could never solidify them. I knew that, if I was going to play very aggressively in a cash game, that I ought to start with less than the maximum stack. Not out of fear of losing too much money, but because I seemed to win more money more often with a lower stack that with the maximum stack. I always felt like I was breaking some sort of best practices concept. It turns out that there are huge advantages to being short stacked in a no limit cash game, and Sklansky points them out. Basically, if most of your play takes place before the flop, the short stack is the way to go. If you do most of your playing after the flop, a full stack is better.

Position is another one that I had problems with. The button is supposed to be the best position, but, in no limit cash games, I made most of my money from the big blind. Again, Sklansky is the first person I've read to tell me that I'm not nuts and that my perceptions are correct.

This is not a book for beginners or even for an experienced limit player who wants to switch to no limit. It is for advanced no limit players.

I have already seen my winnings go up after applying some of the concepts. And, other players are cussing me more often, so I must be getting better. <G>



To: snookcity who wrote (104892)8/11/2006 12:02:58 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
Jamie Gold won the $12 million. Bodog rules. Their CEO couldn't come to the ceremonies as his man was crowned champ, because he would be arrested. <G>

I was rooting for Alan Cunningham, but he has to settle for 4th and a crummy $3.5 million.

San Antonio entry, Lee, finished 5th.