Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (2159)	8/7/2006 5:00:56 PM
From: Logain Ablar	Respond to of 50720

Slider: While I agree with your thinking that LNG is an intermediate term solution to our heating / energy needs (at least I think thats what you meant, feel free to correct) my problem is I don't see the facilities being developed in the short term. I just don't see LNG terminals being expanded / created to meet the demand. Too much opposition from the anti business and environmental lobby's. We'll need higher price pain than what we see now to have leglislation passed. Right now CT's electric rates are 70% higher than 2005 levels and the LNG terminal in LI Sound has strong opposition.