Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockalot who wrote (23184)	8/7/2006 4:09:02 AM
From: Math Junkie	Respond to of 42834

"Math, I guess you just can't bring yourself to admit Brinker is quite a fibber." It seems you've forgotten our conversation about STII already. I have no problem with calling him a fibber when I think it's true. "Is he a liar, Math? A yes or no for a change would be nice but go ahead and give me the reasons why you would back up Brinker on this claim." Now Stockalot, I have an answer to that question, but I have been very good about answering your questions, and I see that you haven't answered most of mine. So I'm not going to answer any more questions from you until you answer mine. Then I will be happy to continue answering your questions. Here they are again for your convenience: Why do you attach so much importance to my beliefs about what another person was thinking? Do you think Brinker's not trusting his own model is some kind of exoneration? Why do you not see that Brinker could have changed his mind? Or do you think that changing one's mind is lying? Are you claiming that the money that initially went into MSFT and VOD came from "all portfolios" too? If you still believe that the QQQ "trade" had to be in the model portfolios, then why aren't you making the same claim for the initial MSFT and VOD recommendations?