SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Polite Political Discussion- is it Possible? An Experiment. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (657)8/7/2006 9:50:45 AM
From: epicureRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 1695
 
I'm not sure what your point is. If I say I don't like the purposes of group X, then you bring a list of groups A, B, and C, I'm not sure what the connection is. Not liking the purposes of group X does not make a point about any other group.

Are you trying to make some point about the Neocon agenda as compared to other agendas? If so, I have to tell you that many people fine the Neocon agenda particularly disturbing because of it's emphasis on military "solutions"- though one can hardly call them solutions when one looks at the results at the moment.



To: KLP who wrote (657)8/7/2006 10:22:55 AM
From: RambiRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 1695
 
Hi, KLP, sure, there are lots of groups I am wary of. I've never been a fan of the KKK, either. I would look just as suspiciously at anyone with ties to MoveOn.org as I would the names attached to PNAC. For instance, Jeb Bush was associated with it; for me, that now eliminates him as a future presidential candidate.
But what about that list would make me change my opinion of PNAC?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News