SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (195674)8/7/2006 3:03:52 PM
From: kumar  Respond to of 281500
 
OK, lets forget stats. Lets assume u agree that the difference would have been 2% based on the criteria you mentioned.

That would revise my numbers to : 73% of eligible voters did not vode for the winning candidate.

In this scenario - it makes no difference "who won" - the numbers I state would have been in the same ballpark if someone else won.



To: KLP who wrote (195674)8/7/2006 4:21:51 PM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
As an aside - the thread header here is "Foreign Affairs Discussion Group", not US Domestic Politics.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News