Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ThirdEye who wrote (75675)	8/7/2006 2:56:21 PM
From: Travis_Bickle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362293

I think the pope would say it is wrong to murder the innocent for whatever reason, and murdering one innocent to save another innocent is still murder. As no one could be more innocent than an unborn child, any "trade off" to save another person would be immoral. Not that I agree with his view on abortion.

To: ThirdEye who wrote (75675)	8/7/2006 3:47:30 PM
From: manalagi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362293

There are many people who may regret the decision: Sandra Day O'Connner - she had the deciding vote, now she has to take care of her ailing husband who suffers from prostrate cancer. Apparently during her busy schedule, justice O'Conner neglected her husband's needs. Justice O'Conner experience should be a reminder to all good wives: husbands have needs, and when the need is not released, prostrate cancer can developed - regardless how many Palmetto pills are taken daily -.