SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SARMAN who wrote (195908)8/7/2006 9:50:37 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 281500
 
Cheaper? Certainly. More effective? Questionable. Any attempt could easily fail, even multiple attempts could fail, and its an open question that things would be any better with Uday or Qusay or some Baath party thug than with Saddam.



To: SARMAN who wrote (195908)8/8/2006 2:28:42 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Wouldn't been cheaper and more effective to have him assassinated ? Please do not tell it is against the LAW. The US has and is doing far worst things that assassination.

In fact, that was how the war commenced.. With an attack on Dora Farms, where human intelligence had reported that Saddam and his sons were staying.

It was against the law previously. I understand that Bush issued a classified Executive Order suspending this ban.

Hawk


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News