SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (195964)8/8/2006 1:30:03 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Conservatively we caused 40K deaths in Iraq. I compare that to the horrific 3K of 9/11 and am not sure you and I are from the same planet.

So if Al Qaeda kills people in Iraq, we caused it? What are the jihadis, robots without personal responsibility?



To: neolib who wrote (195964)8/8/2006 10:19:29 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
As Nadine pointed out we didn't kill them, also why that total may be accurate I'm not sure I'd call it very conservative. If it was accurate it, and if things actually do get better than we will have freed 25 million people from a tyrannical regime that was responsible for the deaths of a much greater number of people. If the violence ends tomorrow (yes I know it won't) it would have been worth it.



To: neolib who wrote (195964)8/8/2006 1:48:34 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Conservatively we caused 40K deaths in Iraq

First many of those deaths belong to the terrorists fighting us and the new democratic regime.

Second, I recall UNICEF claimed Iraq was having around 50K excess deaths of children per year due to sanctions.

Maybe you should factor those two tings into your calculation?