SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (195965)8/8/2006 1:28:29 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
1. You were wrong about Ali


I said she wasn't an atheist as far I as knew. If she has announced being an atheist, then I stand corrected. As for her being a liberal, what exactly do you think a classical small "l" liberal IS? It is someone who believes in human rights and responsibilities on the level of an individual citizen, with equality under the law. In short, this

VVD, a Dutch political party that combines right wing views on foreign policy, the economy, crime and immigration with a liberal stance on drugs and abortion

describes it very well. What is described as "right wing" in Dutch politics wouldn't even make it as far right as most of the Republican party in this country; she would be a libertarian/independent here.

What in the world would make you think I'm for Sharia?

That's not what I said. Let me say it as simply as I can. To have a fatwa issued against you is not the same as being stalked. The stalker is a private person who is breaking the law. The fatwa-follower is FOLLOWING Sharia law, and has the backing and support of many people to do so. This makes him stronger and more dangerous.