Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (10400)	8/8/2006 12:27:18 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14758

If people could PM you, you might have better relations with them. Did you ever consider that?

To: epicure who wrote (10400)	8/9/2006 2:53:56 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

Mckinney ran on the impeach Bush platform and she got her ass handed to her

To: epicure who wrote (10400)	8/9/2006 9:57:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14758

Here we have another violation of paragraph 1 ("You may talk about ANY topic, but you may not call any group names.") which got another laugh out of you. Message 22701592 Message 22701619 When someone calls a group the "Fox crowd" or "gay bashers", you may agree with them. But those labels are no more polite than calling liberals the "NPR crowd" or "gay lovers". Would those labels pass muster in your Experiment? I doubt it.

To: epicure who wrote (10400)	8/9/2006 11:12:01 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14758

Definition of hypocrisy. Message 22702089

To: epicure who wrote (10400)	8/10/2006 2:32:59 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14758

So you tell KLP that you have changed the thread header in her "honor". KLP replies that you are a "sweetheart" for doing that just for her. You then threaten to ban KLP for getting personal because she called you "sweetheart"! LOL!! Apparently it never occurred to you that further restricting the thread in KLP's "honor" was nothing but a personal affront. An impolite one at that.

To: epicure who wrote (10400)	8/10/2006 2:45:43 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14758

<< I expect you to act here with the sorts of social norms adults use in a PTA gathering- where you aren't actually trying to antagonize other people. >> Message 22706667 Would you walk into a PTA meeting and tell another parent that, in her "honor", you are proposing a new bylaw restricting what can be discussed at PTA meetings? How polite! How adult! LOL!!!!