Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rich evans who wrote (8605)	8/9/2006 12:00:30 PM
From: ahhaha	Respond to of 24758

I guess the point of post was that what is happening in the Middle East which is portrayed as negative is actually positive compared to the past false stability situation. Why not say that in the opening sentence called a "topic sentence". A civil war in Iraq is fine. We can withdraw our forces to the desert to about 20000 special forces with airpower to prevent other countries involvment, another terrorist dictator or AQ type involvment. And Israel is better off fighting now before Iran has nuclear deterrant and Hezbollah/Syria even stronger. You could have added the above as "concluding sentences". Joined with the topic your post would have been more focussed. I was replying to Darlenes opinion which was different. Maybe not all that far away. This is not a geopolitical thread so sorry. SI Admin thinks it was, or thinks this "board" is predominantly political and wants to move it accordingly. Obviously Dave doesn't read us. Thanks for reply to Fed statement. You see, that post could be termed, "political", because it goes against the accepted view.