Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (15104)	8/9/2006 3:19:39 PM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 32591

Bush was the weak-kneed one. He did absolutely nothing on counter-terrorism before 9-11, then turned around and blamed it on Saddam, who had nothing to do with it, and Osama Bin LAden is still alive. Just amazing. Bush wasn't president when all the preparations were made for 9/11 someone named clinton was on the throne. The preparations were finalized before George even took office. Remember George was only President for 7 months when 9/11 happened. And George went into Afghanistan after Al Qaeda if you recall..... Before Iraq, Afghanistan..... Of course Bill clinton's handling of the first bombing of the World trade center was less than masterful, at least George tried to do something about the bombing on his watch, and Clinton was also the president who brought us the slaughter in Waco Texas. Clinton should have started on Counter Terrorism in 1993, and then their might not have been a second attack, but while Clinton was president, the killers for 9/11 were in the US training for their murderous attack. Clinton and his entire Government had no clue.