SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Line Investment Survey -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SI Dave who wrote (145)8/17/2006 3:34:50 AM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219
 
...they are seeing very attractive value in the market. It doesn't happen to that degree very often.

I'm starting to see attractive values in the markets, not that there isn't substantial risks involved though. Over the past few years, my growth at a reasonable price (GAARP) filters have been yielding maybe 10 or 15 stocks in any given week. These are not stocks to invest in, rather being stocks to investigate. Usually, there's a major blemish somewhere, which is why the stock is bargain-priced to begin with. Over the past oh, 2 to 3 months or so, the number of stocks returned from the screens and filters has jumped into the 30 to 40 range. I haven't seen values like that since shortly before the year 2000, when everyone was in the "hot" stock of the week, and good large-cap companies were virtually ignored. Right now I'm seeing a lot of value in the mid-caps, as well as a few large-caps. Small-caps still seem to have a large number of speculators in their midst, so my guess is that small-caps is where the momo players are hiding out. The numbers of prospective stocks that have some value are growing very steady each and every week. Yes, the pigs still have blemishes, but not all of the blemishes are bad. I'm hoping that a few might really be beauty marks...

I used Value Line for over a decade as my primary stock screener.

Value Line is my primary stock tool. I also use S&P, as well as a host of other market tools for research on things such as insider sales, revenues/earnings expectations, whisper numbers, etcetera. With the exception of Value Line and the S&P reports, every other tool involves secondary considerations and sidewise glances, maybe market timing, rather than something that makes me want to buy a given stock (or not to buy, as the case may be). All that said, Value Line offers the best "guidance" for us stay-at-home investors.

EK!!!



To: SI Dave who wrote (145)8/19/2006 3:01:25 AM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219
 
I was just sharing some thoughts with someone recently on pharmaceuticals. Was it you? Pfizer, if I recollect correctly? Anywho, this Value Line editor apparently is long-term bullish on the drug companies...

valueline.com

The Value Line Mutual Fund Survey

---------------------------------
Published June 6, 2006
---------------------------------

Drugs, Another Update


Over the past year or so, I've mentioned that I believe large drug companies are a good long-term investment. I still believe that, even if a turnaround still isn't in sight.

I've even initiated positions in three drug stocks that I'll build up over the rest of this year or so. My choices, driven by my penchant for dividends, were Pfizer, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The prices of each were higher when I bought them then when I first commented on the segment over a year ago, much to my chagrin. In addition to these three stocks, GlaxoSmithKline and Eli Lilly are others worth looking at.

For fund investors, the purest options are exchange traded funds (ETFs) HOLDERS Pharmaceutical (PPH) and PowerShares Dynamic Pharmaceuticals (PJP), and actively manged mutual fund Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Fund. Of the three, the Fidelity fund is the only one to post a respectable year-to-date gain through April, advancing about 8%. The other two were, essentially, breakeven or so over that span. My more broad-based fund recommendations, Vanguard Health Care Fund and T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund, were both about breakeven or down slightly, too.

Although these results don't shout out resounding success over the short term, this recommendation isn't intended for short-term results. I'm suggesting adding a beaten-down industry to the core of your portfolio. Moreover, I wouldn't allocate a huge amount of your portfolio to this segment, but up to 5% of assets, well diversified within the industry, wouldn't be outlandish.

The point is that, despite the negatives that are hurting pharmaceutical stocks, there are a lot of positives that aren't getting as much attention.

We've all read about the ongoing legal woes, patent expirations, and thin new product pipelines that are crimping drug companies' results. These are real issues that will have to be dealt with. My belief is that the industry will cope with the present problems and move forward. How this will be done I'm not sure, but it's likely to include restructurings, layoffs, and mergers. It might even get uglier before it gets better.

Still, Value Line's Drug Industry specialist George Rho notes that demographic and socioeconomic trends in the world today, such as increasing longevity and rising living standards, should be long-term positives for the pharmaceutical industry. Rho also points out that history suggests that there is a cyclical nature to important drug discoveries. Put these factors together with the currently low prices commanded by some of the biggest and historically most successful companies in the industry and, in my eyes, it spells a long-term buying opportunity.

Still, recent results aren't anything to write home about, and near-term performance isn't likely to be too impressive. Indeed, Value Line gives the industry only a middling rank for year-ahead performance. Healthy cash flow, however, should provide most in the industry ample time to improve company-specific prospects.

What will I do now? Well, I've put my money where my mouth is, and I've purchased three companies that pay relatively substantial dividends. My plan, essentially, is to dollar cost average over two more purchases. I'll be done after that.

This isn't a stock newsletter, so funds are more likely your chosen investment vehicle. So, if you own any of the funds I've mentioned, don't do anything—you already have exposure here. Let that ride, assuming it's under 5% of your total portfolio. Anything more and you might consider trimming your position a little.

If you don't have any exposure, Fidelity's select offering has proven to be a solid option, with the two exchange-traded funds as index-oriented back ups. If you prefer a less specific approach, T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund is a good choice, as Vanguard Health Care Fund is currently closed to new investors.

Reuben Gregg Brewer
Editor


EK!!!