Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (196526)	8/10/2006 9:54:15 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 281500

Do you know why Saddam attacked Kuwait? Do you know what Poppy Bush did before he invaded? I know that neither Kuwait, nor the US, invaded Iraq. So I really don't care about Saddam's justifications. YOU, OTOH, seem to take great pains to find excuses and justications for Saddam invading, occupying, AND ANNEXING, Kuwait. Did you receive some of Saddam's oil allocations too? Hawk

To: geode00 who wrote (196526)	8/10/2006 10:25:26 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 281500

It's like the little kid who pokes the dogs in the eye, the dog growls, the kid decides to see what else will get a growl, he pokes him in the nose, gets bit and the parents blame everything on the dog. Then I guess, USING YOUR LOGIC, Israel would have every right to attack Iran and Syria, since they have armed and guided Hizbullah to attack Israel, not to mention Ahmadinejad's threats to wipe Israel off the map. Israel has never attack Iran. Israel, so far as I know, has never threaten to attack Iran (except as a declaration of self-defense). So does this logic of yours justify Israel attacking, invading, occupying, AND ANNEXING Iran?? (were they capable of doing so)?? Hawk