Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Calladine who wrote (76240)	8/10/2006 1:13:40 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 363092

what kind of technical background do you have that would cause us to consider your observations seriously? I'm and engineer and scientist. I have gone out of my way to examine the evidence in this case since it is rather important to current events. DENIAL of intelligent study and commentary from academics and professionals I know far too many smart people to be persuaded by authority alone. It is the arguments and conclusions I find fault with, not the credentials. I believe that there is also a specific effort by the administration to move discussion of 9/11 immediately into these arguments over thermite or cruise missles because they provide a distraction to the real question - How much advance knowledge did Cheney and the Neocons have of this event? The individual factoids, such as why are the principal buildings of the WTC different from all those other buildings in the history of steel structures, and why WTC-7 fell a different way are best explained one at a time, in detail, and not as a superficial information dump. I would leave it up to Sioux as to whether this is a good forum for that, or perhaps another forum such as: Subject 56533