Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (196576)	8/10/2006 12:56:35 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Wes Clark on "Being Strong on National Security" dailykos.com by kos Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 11:13:54 AM PDT Wesley Clark came out strongly for Ned Lamont today, but it's this passage that particularly caught my attention: You see, despite what Joe Lieberman believes, invading Iraq and diverting our attention away from Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is not being strong on national security. Blind allegiance to George W. Bush and his failed "stay the course" strategy is not being strong on national security. And no, Senator Lieberman, no matter how you demonize your opponents, there is no "antisecurity wing" of the Democratic Party. Well said. That's the Democratic message on National Security this year, and it works. That's why Republicans are freaking out.