SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Katelew who wrote (196630)8/10/2006 4:49:33 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 281500
 
Kate.. here we go again.. Flechettes ARE NOT BANNED.

en.wikipedia.org

But using them in civilian areas is certainly controversial, and probably immoral, since they are devastingly effective.

I've seen a cut-away example of a 155 "beehive" round, and there thousands of these flechettes encased within...

Kinda like those Syria Katyushas which are filled with ball bearings.

But the difference is that they are VERY MUCH LEGAL TO USE against military targets and formations of enemy soldiers.

They would not be justified in being used as weapons targeted against civilian cities, as Hizbullah does with their ball-bearing filled rockets.

But you know something.. war is war. And while people like you might complain until you turn blue in the face, if those weapons help to end the fighting sooner by causing the enemy to capitulate, then I'm all for them.

Hawk



To: Katelew who wrote (196630)8/10/2006 5:04:25 PM
From: Geoff Altman  Respond to of 281500
 
Kate, come back and post after you've done more research......
I'm sure there's 100s of weapons in our arsenal that you think should be banned... Unfortunately thinking they should be and actually having them banned internationally are 2 different things.