Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (299292)	8/10/2006 9:46:00 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579789

re: it's clear to me that the terrorists are going after America's allies, not America itself. They know that America's allies are more easily scared away. It's all about going after the "soft targets." And America isn't a "soft target." That's contradictory. Is it "soft targets" or the "easily scared away" they are going after? lol, try again John. Anerica's allies are the soft targets... There is no contradiction.

To: Road Walker who wrote (299292)	8/10/2006 10:03:46 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 1579789

JF, But frankly the Europeans are much less easily "scared away"; they have been dealing with terrorism for a long, long time. Worked for Spain, no? Britain is next. All to isolate America in the war on terror and get the whole world blaming America for the mess in the Middle East. Our military adventures in the Muslim/Arab lands cause terrorism against us. Our police actions help prevent terrorism, when they are able. No one is arguing against police actions, but that will never prevent 100% of the terrorism attacks against us. All the terrorists have to do is keep trying and trying until they succeed. So now what? Since you think America and Britian is causing terrorism against us, it's obvious what your long-term position is ... appeasement. Tenchusatsu