Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (8186)	8/11/2006 7:36:40 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217705

Attempting to destroy Hizbollah (impossible to achieve, in my view) would have the same effect as an attack on Iran; it would strengthen Ahmadinejad. Given that I equate "destroying" with disarming, or killing the ARMED portions of Hizbullah, let me see if I understand your logic properly. Disarming and neutralizing Hizbullah's ability to conduct further terrorist or military operations, and seizing, or destroying the millions of dollars worth of Katyushas and other weaponry that Syria and Iran have given to Hizbullah, would actually strengthen Ahmadinejad? So what you seem to be telling us all is that if we leave Hizbullah's military capability intact, thus ensuring they remain more powerful than Lebanon's army, this will weaken Ahmadinejad, right? Hell.. using that logic, maybe we should be arming Hizbullah ourselves... Hawk