SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (196936)8/11/2006 10:01:46 PM
From: SARMAN  Respond to of 281500
 
Are you nuts? That is the reason why America had 9/11 and the policies did not change. God help us if another 9/11 happened.



To: GST who wrote (196936)8/14/2006 1:24:33 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I trust American prosecution of American war criminals far more than I trust any international tribunal getting such authority over American soldiers. Their would be risk of prosecution of essentially political reasons, for not agreeing with a particular war, and thinking any aggressive prosecution of an "unjust war" is a "war crime", if some international body had such authority. In addition to this potentially negative consequences I don't see much if anything on the positive side. I don't think any international body would do a better job than the current UCMJ enforcement.