SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: samtrader who wrote (196963)8/12/2006 12:59:31 AM
From: bentway  Respond to of 281500
 
It's you clowns that are naive, following the neocons into a truly terrible future, frightened, scared wimps. Fortunately, more and more Americans are snapping out of it. Bush is in the low 30's now. Americans want him GONE.

Leiberman has started with the fearmongering since his loss. Perhaps he can run AIPAC?



To: samtrader who wrote (196963)8/12/2006 1:14:48 AM
From: Don Hurst  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
>>" (For anyone else genuinely interested in the Pak nuke situation, I'll take the time when I return from vacation next week and dig up the articles that were published 4 years ago.) "<<

Please, please oh great one, postpone your vacation...we need your wisdom now!!



To: samtrader who wrote (196963)8/12/2006 10:59:59 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Its interesting how much hostility you get from Hurst and Parsons. Maybe they hate Indians as much as the do israelis? (g)In any case it is not outlandish to believe that a Western man such as Musharif would do the right thing and let the US know how, where and when to get the nukes if he is killed, overthrown etc. It is clear what is he up against in pakistan. Knowing that world destruction would probably follow nukes falling into bin ladens hand, any decent man would do the same. Operative word is decent and neither parsons or hurst know the meaning of that word.