Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (23531)	8/12/2006 2:32:16 AM
From: queenleah	Respond to of 42834

queen to kirk; "if you are so proud of your product and are so comfortale with yourself and your success, why do you find it so necessary to spend SO MUCH time tearing some comepetitor down? I spend less time at it that you do denying the obvious. Is that supposed to pass for an answer? It wasn't about me or others. It was a question for you. Go back and read posts here from 1997 and 1998. It was on this very site that I argued Brinker's advertising had some "issues" before I ever had a newsletter. Bully for you. I'll take your word for it. Which begs the question: Are you planning to cut down on the 24/7 Brinkerbashing and instigating thereof so others can take the ball and run with it any time soon? Now that you're so successful, and all, I mean. Bottom line is I was here and this place was quiet. I only point out how mistaken you are. That's certainly your privilege. You asked me questions. I responded. You like to claim Brinker's lying, though there seems to be nothing in the ad that is not true. I maintain if there's nothing IN THE AD that's not true, call it what you will, but you're on thin ice. BTW, even dija admits he is dishonest when he says he made 3 calls when we all know he made 4 major calls Dija has a right to his opinion. I respect his opinions and his straightforwardness. That doesn't mean I will agree with him completely 100 out of 100 times. Also doesn't mean he or I or you or anyone else has a 100% lock on the truth. I used to think you had some credibility, but I was wrong. Sorry, but I never did think had some credibility so I guess we're even.

To: Kirk © who wrote (23531)	8/12/2006 2:34:59 AM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

queen to kirk; "if you are so proud of your product and are so comfortable with yourself and your success, why do you find it so necessary to spend SO MUCH time tearing some competitor down? I spend less time at it that you do denying the obvious. Is that supposed to pass for an answer? It wasn't about me or others. It was a question for you. Go back and read posts here from 1997 and 1998. It was on this very site that I argued Brinker's advertising had some "issues" before I ever had a newsletter. Bully for you. I'll take your word for it. Which begs the question: Are you planning to cut down on the 24/7 Brinkerbashing and instigating thereof so others can take the ball and run with it any time soon? Now that you're so successful, and all, I mean. Bottom line is I was here and this place was quiet. I only point out how mistaken you are. That's certainly your privilege. You asked me questions. I responded. You like to claim Brinker's lying, though there seems to be nothing in the ad that is not true. I maintain if there's nothing IN THE AD that's not true, call it what you will, but you're on thin ice. BTW, even dija admits he is dishonest when he says he made 3 calls when we all know he made 4 major calls Dija has a right to his opinion. I respect his opinions and his straightforwardness. That doesn't mean I will agree with him completely 100 out of 100 times. Also doesn't mean he or I or you or anyone else has a 100% lock on the truth. I used to think you had some credibility, but I was wrong. Sorry, but I never did think had some credibility so I guess we're even.

To: Kirk © who wrote (23531)	8/12/2006 5:09:44 AM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

"Someone here, it was either Pete or Richard, er math, said if I thought it was so easy that I should try it myself." It wasn't me.

To: Kirk © who wrote (23531)	8/12/2006 7:39:22 AM
From: shres	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Be on the lookout for a poster who says he is a successful investor and newsletter writer but also reads email ads for pay. He even has a thread devoted to getting others to do the same but one of the posters says it's a scam. Do you think Bob Brinker reads email for pay in his spare time? Yep, Mr. "I Made A Fortune" signs up to read email ads for pennies. He even gives them his SS number! Just yesterday he says..."I also clicked on half a dozen emailed ads just today....Most just read the ads so they get paid." A real professional. Is there anything this person will not do for a few pitiful pennies?