Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wave3rules who wrote (135533)	8/12/2006 2:28:28 PM
From: Shack	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 209892

I need to step in here wave3. Yours' and Freeps' "discussion" on the matter notwithstanding, I do not care for PPT talk on this thread. The concept is symptomatic of permabear thinking and not related to what this thread is about. If you are making it tantamount to M3 expansion, then please just refer to it as just that. Its more than just semantics to me. I agree that money supply expansion does indeed impact the markets on a macro level, but the reason this market is not going down at any great rate may have more to do with things such as Rydex SPX traders being 10-1 short versus long rather than monetary intervention. Money supply was expanding rapidly during the bear a few year's back as well. In other words contrary to your assertion, I do not think this is anything to consider when shorting the markets, at the very least not on this thread. It reminds me of when during the 2000-2002 bear all the permabull clowns were blaming the shorts for the plunge. I despise this kind of discussion. I'm sure there are plenty of other threads where one could discuss it ad nauseum if one so chose. Thanks.