Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (197024)	8/12/2006 4:08:17 PM
From: geode00	Respond to of 281500

Then good for Hoover, bad for FDR. We should have learned something then and some of us have. Judging by Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, NSA spying and, now, Bush trying to get an ammendment that leaves him and his cohorts immune from war crimes prosecution, others have not. boston.com "White House proposes retroactive war crimes protection Moves to shield policy makers By Pete Yost, Associated Press \| August 10, 2006 The Bush administration drafted amendments to the War Crimes Act that would retroactively protect policy makers from possible criminal charges for authorizing any humiliating and degrading treatment of detainees, according to lawyers who have seen the proposal...."