Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (13321)	8/14/2006 12:22:51 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20039

What kind of coherent plan were you expecting? Just to take one example:, If WTC-1,2,&7 were rigged with explosives then there would have to be a reason that nobody saw them being installed (or there would have to be evidence that someone did see them installed). Either way it is part of a coherent story (perhaps story is a better word than plan since "plan" gets all caught up in motive and the like). That's one of the strengths of science. You can't just put together a bunch of factoids, there has to be a theory. The theory has to be in agreement with all the factoids. When there is disagreement, it begs to be explained and this includes why it appears to be in disagreement with the theory (The exception proofs the rule). I see the professors webpage, and dozens like it, as a bunch of factoids with only a very general theory and a good deal of unexplained contradiction. TP