Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (299879)	8/14/2006 12:58:04 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1578926

Elroy, the issue was relocation. You implied that it's easier to relocate 6M Israelis than 500M Arabs. I'm implying that the number of Arabs who have to relocate is a lot smaller than 500M, and even then, no one is advocating their relocation. Not even Israel. How many Arabs would need to be relocated before Israel doesn't border an Arab country which hates it?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (299879)	8/14/2006 5:36:09 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578926

Elroy, the issue was relocation. You implied that it's easier to relocate 6M Israelis than 500M Arabs. I'm implying that the number of Arabs who have to relocate is a lot smaller than 500M, and even then, no one is advocating their relocation. Not even Israel. If Israel stayed where it is, you have to move the populations of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt as well as the Arabs in Israel, the WB and Gaza. That number would be roughly 111 million people. After you had relocated them, you would have to leave those countries empty for security purposes with checkpoints scattered around the perimeter. It seems to me it would be much easier to move 4.8 Israeli Jews [1.2 million of the 6 million are either Muslims, Christians or Druze]than the Arabs in question.....but then that's me.