Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (23617)	8/14/2006 2:56:59 PM
From: stockalot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Yes Honey, Math has a hard time splaining how people came by these "cash reserves" that amount to 65% of an equity portfolio without selling anything in the model portfolios. His latest is to claim that people didn't have to have any money in the model portfolios so the cash reserves didn't come from model portfolio money. Now isn't that about as dishonest as it gets? Claiming that the cash reserves spoke of in that urgent bulletin..(btw has anyone seen Math post a list of bulletins prior to Oct 2000 that established a pattern of how Brinker handled them???) were not from model portfolio proceeds is about the most unique approach to apologizing for the dishonest disaster brought about by Bob Brinker's QQQ fiasco I've heard. I suppose that Math would have people believe that Bob Brinker sent the bulletin having in mind that only those who did not use the model portfolios would invest their cash reserves in the QQQs and those that were in possession of cash reserves obtained from sales within model portfolios would know that they were not to ACT IMMEDIATELY. I can't believe anyone would try this silliness. BTW " November 2000, Marketimer, Page 2, Paragraph 4: "In sum, subscribers can use a portion of their 65% stock market cash reserve position in order to purchase QQQ shares or Rydex OTC Fund...........The ideal accumulation price range is in the low-to-mid 70's." . Bob Brinker still has that QQQ idea now a long term holding that has grown to QQQQ but is dishonestly trying to hide it. I wonder if Math would like to take a shot at alibing for Bob Brinker in claiming" the ideal accumulation price range is in the low to mid 70s" ?(dishonestly lowering the buy point in November rag) . They are trading at 36 something today Math. Parse and spin that claim and entertain us with how Brinker was right and the goobers and geezers listening to him were wrong.