Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (299911)	8/14/2006 4:01:04 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579417

That link doesn't dispute a warning at all. Or am I missing something? You are missing "truthiness"... en.wikipedia.org Al

To: combjelly who wrote (299911)	8/14/2006 5:23:59 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1579417

CJ, That link doesn't dispute a warning at all. Or am I missing something? Actually, I was the one who missed the gist of your last post. I'm pretty sure Clinton did indeed warn Bush about Osama. The issue here, however, is whether the threat was imminent enough to act upon. Clinton didn't act upon that threat despite all of the times Osama attacked under his watch. Why is it expected that Bush should have acted upon that same threat before the unthinkable happened? Tenchusatsu