SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (26566)8/15/2006 9:24:50 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 540963
 
Soros, extremist? Opposed to Bush, certainly... but I think not extreme in any of his own views. And, as I said, perceptive.


On Terror: "How can we escape from the trap that the terrorists have set us?" he asked. "Only by recognizing that the war on terrorism cannot be won by waging war. We must, of course, protect our security; but we must also correct the grievances on which terrorism feeds.... Crime requires police work, not military action."
...
On the Bush Administration: "An open society is a society which allows its members the greatest possible degree of freedom in pursuing their interests compatible with the interests of others," Soros said. "The Bush administration merely has a narrower definition of self-interest. It does not include the interests of others."
...

On America: "I grew up in Hungary, lived through fascism and the Holocaust, and then had a foretaste of communism. I learned at an early age how important it is what kind of government prevails. I chose America as my home because I value freedom and democracy, civil liberties and an open society. When I had made more money than I needed for myself and my family, I set up a foundation to promote the values and principles of a free and open society."


Plus he puts his money where his mouth is:
Soros has been active as a philanthropist since the 1970s, when he began providing funds to help black students attend the University of Cape Town in apartheid South Africa, and began funding dissident movements behind the iron curtain.
[e.g. Solidarity, Charter 77 and Andrei Sakharov ... it's hard to think of three worthier recipients of help during the Cold War; not that the official West was so welcoming, to them or against apartheid. Perceptive, again].

...
As of 2003, PBS estimated that he had given away a total of $4 billion. The OSI says it has spent about $400 million annually in recent years.

Of course, I agree also with his latest philanthopy...
Soros was not a large donor to US political causes until the U.S. presidential election, 2004... Soros gave $3 million to the Center for American Progress, committed $5 million to MoveOn, while he and his friend Peter Lewis each gave America Coming Together $10 million. (All were groups that worked to support Democrats in the 2004 election.) On September 28, 2004 he dedicated more money to the campaign and kicked off his own multi-state tour with a speech: Why We Must Not Re-elect President Bush delivered at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. The online transcript to this speech received many hits after Dick Cheney accidentally referred to FactCheck.org as "factcheck.com" in the Vice Presidential debate, causing the owner of that domain to redirect all traffic to Soros's site.

(quotes from en.wikipedia.org



To: Rambi who wrote (26566)8/15/2006 11:43:38 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540963
 
I don't think either Soros or Krugman are even close to the "extremist" tag but I could see an argument for considering Chomsky as such.

But that would require a rather elaborate discussion as to the content of the word "extremist" and the content of Chomsky's various writings. I suspect neither of us want to spend today doing that.