Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (197487)	8/15/2006 12:14:33 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 281500

Maybe tactically Israel might have gone for "a 70% solution acted on immediately and violently", but operationally or strategically they didn't. Message 20699853

To: TimF who wrote (197487)	8/15/2006 12:19:42 PM
From: SARMAN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

It is the moral and psychological victory. After all I do not believe that war produces winners only losers. My reasoning is that is on person dies (especially civilian)the war is lost. However, to be able to stand up to the ME supper power and survive, that is a victory. Think of the other Arabs that fought Israel with their large armies and failed. Do not forget that Israel is a terrorist state that terrorizes its neighbors. The Arabs are afraid of Israel and its might. A little militia was able to stop it, which tells you something. It tells me Israel is no longer the supper power that it is and it better sit down and negotiate with its neighbors.