Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (13500)	8/16/2006 2:02:03 AM
From: Proud Deplorable	Respond to of 20039

sorry I meant WTC7

To: TigerPaw who wrote (13500)	8/16/2006 2:35:24 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

A pyroclastic flow requires intense heat. The 600 degree centigrade fires in a small area relative to the size of the debris cloud and resulting pyroclastic flow was not capable of providing the heat energy necessary to create a pyroclastic flow. Nor was there enough energy in the official theory of collapse to produce the flow. "The third proof is one that I've published a paper on, and it's based on the expansion ratio of the pyroclastic cloud following the collapse of 1 World Trade Center, the North Tower. Now the part of the cloud that I'm talking about is this dense part down here, the pyroclastic part, the part that's like a volcano. This part up here is a lot of smoke. So what I do is I compute an estimate of the volume of this cloud at 30 seconds by taking sample points ... I compute a cylinder, and then based on that I come up with an estimate that the volume was about 5 times the volume of the original building, modulo some mixing, so I reduce my estimate down to an expansion ratio of 3.4 times. Now there is only one way that expansion could have occurred: through the input of huge amounts of heat energy. Normally when you have the demolition of a building there is not that much energy in the explosives, and the dust cloud is about the size of the original building. Not so with the twin Towers -- the dust clouds were multiple times the sizes of the buildings, and the only way that expansion could have occurred is through the input of vast amounts of heat energy to convert water to steam and expand gases. How much heat energy was required? I calculate that at least 1.5 million kWH was required to produce the expansion of the dust cloud of the North Tower to the 30-second mark. That compares with the gravitational potential energy -- the supposed source of all the energy according to the official theory for all this destruction -- of only about 100,000 kilowatt-hours. So basically we have an over ten-fold energy imbalance just looking at the energy required to produce the dust cloud expansion. That doesn't even account for other energy sinks, such as the vast energy sink required to pulverize all that concrete. 911research.wtc7.net Dust Cloud Expansion Energy Sink Vastly Exceeded Gravitational Energy Source Dust cloud of North Tower expanded to about 5 times building volume by 30 seconds from collapse start. Heat energy is required to produce expansion: Ideal gas law: PV = nRT where: P = pressure V = volume T = absolute temperature Heat required over 10X gravitational potential energy. Energy required for 3.4X expansion is on the order of 1,500,000 kWH. Gravitational energy was about 100,000 kWH. 911research.wtc7.net